Companies operating between the United States and Hungary often encounter differences in how each country structures and applies its legal system. Two areas that most significantly affect businesses are contract law and the process of resolving commercial disputes. Understanding these differences helps new companies, investors, and entrepreneurs navigate both markets more confidently.
Contract Law and Interpretation
In the United States, the legal system follows the principles of common law, where both written contracts and previous judicial decisions influence business outcomes. Agreements tend to be highly detailed, with clauses designed to anticipate as many potential scenarios as possible. This extensive drafting reflects the US system's reliance on precedent and the greater likelihood of litigation over disagreements. A good example of how contract interpretation can spark conflict is the high-profile dispute between two influencers over allegedly “copycat” beige-and-cream branding and styling. Even though the case centered on aesthetic choices, it escalated into a legal battle asserting breach of business expectations and intellectual rights before the lawsuit was ultimately dropped. Example:https://www.abajournal.com/news/article/influencer-who-sued-rival-for-alleged-copycat-beige-and-cream-styling-has-dropped-her-lawsuit
Hungary, by contrast, applies a civil law system guided by written legal codes. Contracts are typically more standardized, and courts focus on statutory interpretation rather than past judicial decisions. This creates a more uniform legal environment and less incentive for parties to pursue highly customized or overly detailed contractual terms.
Business Dispute Resolution
The United States uses an adversarial dispute resolution process, often more expansive, costly, and shaped by litigation strategy. The availability of jury trials and extensive discovery can sometimes encourage individuals and businesses to bring forward cases that would not proceed in more structured systems. In extreme instances, the US legal environment has produced unusually creative or weak claims, for example, lawsuits accusing major companies of misleading consumers based on advertising interpretations, such as claims that beer commercials implied unrealistic lifestyle outcomes. Although many of these lawsuits fail, they highlight how easily disputes can escalate into litigation.
Example:https://www.businessinsider.com/the-ten-dumbest-lawsuits-against-big-business-2009-11#misled-beer-drinker-2
Hungary's dispute resolution model is far more judge-directed. Hearings focus strictly on legal documents, statutory rules, and judicial examination of facts. Juries are not involved, and discovery is more limited, resulting in a more predictable and streamlined process. This reduces opportunities for excessively broad or speculative lawsuits.
Relevance for International Companies
For companies expanding or moving between Hungary and the United States, recognizing these two key legal differences is essential. Contract formation, risk management, and dispute strategy may vary considerably depending on the country. Understanding the underlying structure of each legal system allows businesses to better prepare for regulatory requirements, commercial negotiations, and potential conflicts.
English 
Magyar
Recent Comments